 Posted: Thu 23:39, 25 May 2006 Post subject: |
|
| If i were the adm his forum would still be working
"to bad that the admin are so much better than me and they are doin' such a fine jod"(sarcasm) Nachos for admin |
|
| Posted: Sat 23:48, 29 Apr 2006 Post subject: |
|
| define it in any way, so the thread is longer ;P
now yes i agree, we should list 2 types of "cleverness"(difficult to find well fitting word though): in lyrics and in music i can have fun with absolutely any kind of music. i can go to disco, "dance" to techno, even though its not ma music and have a great fun about listening, nope. i wouldnt stand for long. maybe 3 minutes of some techno hit on my mp3, and then or i kill myself or my mp3 suicides ;P lol |
|
| Posted: Sat 17:44, 29 Apr 2006 Post subject: |
|
| haha
it depends on the person if a person is looking for meaning in the music it matters if a person wants just to have fun he can even listen to techno there are some songs that are smart in different aspects. For example u cant say that mozart's music isn't smart but most of his staff doesnt have lyrics. It depends on how u define the word smart |
|
| Posted: Sat 12:37, 29 Apr 2006 Post subject: |
|||
|
|||
| Posted: Sat 7:54, 29 Apr 2006 Post subject: |
|
| No | |
| Posted: Fri 21:05, 28 Apr 2006 Post subject: clever music? yes/no |
|
| does the music have to be ambitious, smart and clever? if yes, why? if not, why not? | |